History, Archaeology and Cultural Studies: A Multidimensional Interpretation of Public Art Practice and Community Belonging in Post-Industrial Landscapes
Keywords:
Public Art, Community Belonging, Post-industrial Landscapes, Cultural Heritage, Multidimensional InterpretationAbstract
Post-industrial landscapes are shaped by the economic transitions and cultural shifts, and they present unique opportunities for public art and heritage to act as catalysts for urban regeneration and community revitalization. This study investigates the transformative role of public art and post-industrial heritage in urban regeneration, focusing on the contributions to community belonging, cultural expression, and socio-economic development. The methodology used in this research is Systematic Literature Review (SLR), whereas secondary data is used to establish the themes. This study examines three themes: Multidimensional Role of Public Art, Historical Narratives and post-industrial Heritage, and Integrated Impact of Public Art and Heritage. Through these themes, the findings reveal that public art fosters social cohesion and cultural regeneration through platforms for dialogue and expression, while post-industrial heritage preserves historical continuity and reinforces community identity. The study highlights the importance of participatory frameworks and interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure inclusivity and sustainability in public art and heritage projects. Despite its contributions, the study is limited by its reliance on secondary data, geographic focus on Europe and China, and lack of longitudinal studies. Future research should expand to underrepresented regions and evaluate long-term impacts. This research underscores the integration of public art and heritage as essential for fostering sustainable, inclusive, and vibrant urban environments.
Downloads
References
Amnuay-ngerntra, S. (2016). Community Development through Public Art Event in Ratchaburi, Thailand. In Cultural and Creative Industries (pp. 90–102). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137508553_7
Arifka, A. (2024). The role of art in building social cohesion in multicultural societies. Journal of Studies on Art, Culture, and Society, 1(2), 38–44.
Borrup, T. (2016). Creative placemaking: Arts and culture as a partner in community revitalization. Boston, MA: University of Massachusetts.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bolonaki, S. (2023). Public art: A review. Social and political practices. CPCL – Contemporary Perspectives on Cultural Landscapes, 6(2).
Chen, G., & Lee, M. (2024). Application of new genre public art in community empowerment: A case study of Chongqing Tie Lu San Cun Village, China. Community Development Journal, bsae053.
Chinedu, E. (2024). The influence of public art on urban revitalization. International Journal of Arts, Recreation and Sports, 3(4), 1–13.
Chu, T., Zhou, M., & Wu, J. (2024). Sustainability performance differences of industrial heritage regeneration implementation modes. Buildings, 14(11), 3489.
Collins, T. (2020). Interventions in the Rust Belt: The art and ecology of post-industrial public space. Ecumene, 7(4), 452-467.
Dogan, E., Cuomo, F., & Battisti, L. (2023). Reviving urban greening in post-industrial landscapes: The case of Turin. Sustainability, 15(17), 12760.
Glimmerveen, L., Ybema, S., & Nies, H. (2021). Who participates in public participation? The exclusionary effects of inclusionary efforts. Administration & Society, 54(4), 543–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211034137
Giani, E., & Carnevale, G. (2015). Enhancing urban heritage: Industrial culture and cultural Industry. Athens Journal of Architecture, 1(1), 35-49.
Hamodat, A. (2021). The Impact of Identity in determining the characteristics of the public arts in landscape. In Cities’ Vocabularies: The Influences and Formations (pp. 157-165). Springer International Publishing.
Heeney, G. (Ed.). (2018). The post-industrial landscape as site for creative practice: Material memory. Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Kadaei, S., Nezam, Z., González-Lezcano, R. A., Shokrpour, S., Mohammadtaheri, A., Doraj, P., & Akar, U. (2023). A new approach to determine the reverse logistics-related issues of smart buildings focusing on sustainable architecture. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1079522.
Macdonald, S. (2013). Memorylands: Heritage and identity in Europe today. London, UK: Routledge.
Martins, J., & Landy, F. (2021). Reconnecting industrial heritage and community identity through public art interventions: A case study approach. Landscape and Urban Planning, 210, 104-117.
McCarthy, J. (2006). Regeneration of cultural quarters: public art for place image or place identity?. Journal of Urban Design, 11(2), 243-262.
Niu, S., Lau, S. S. Y., & Shen, Z. (2018). Sustainability issues in the industrial heritage adaptive reuse: rethinking culture-led urban regeneration through Chinese case studies. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 33, 501-518.
Nocca, F. (2017). The role of cultural heritage in sustainable development: Multidimensional indicators as decision-making tool. Sustainability, 9(10), 1882.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., . . . Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372.
Ploof, J., & Hochtritt, L. J. (2018). Practicing social justice art education: Reclaiming our agency through collective curriculum. Art Education, 71(1), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2018.1389592
Petti, L., Trillo, C., & Makore, B. N. (2020). Cultural heritage and sustainable development targets: A possible harmonisation? Insights from the European perspective. Sustainability, 12(3), 926. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030926
Prawata, A. G. (2024). Public art as generator for creating the desirable city. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1324(1), 012030. http://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1324/1/012030
Rodríguez, L., & Pérez, A. (2020). Public art and industrial heritage: Balancing representation and critique in urban regeneration projects. Heritage, 3(2), 210-225.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339.
Sun, M., & Chen, C. (2021). Renovation of industrial heritage sites and sustainable urban regeneration in post-industrial Shanghai. Journal of Urban Affairs, 45, 729–752. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2021.1881404
Soeiro, D., Falanga, R., Martins, J., & Pomesano, L. (2022). Sustainable urban regeneration: The role of cultural heritage in Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) Authors Diana Soeiro. Conservar Património, 40, 9-28.
Soja, E. W. (2009). The city and spatial justice. Justice Spatiale | Spatial Justice, 1. https://www.jssj.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/JSSJ1-1en4.pdf
Wang, K. (2024). Temporal insights into mega-events and waterfront industrial heritage transformation: A case study of Shanghai’s Huangpu River industrial zone. Built Heritage, 8(1), 48.
Wilmar, P. (2024). Art in public spaces and community interaction. Nonsuch Foundation. Retrieved from https://nonsuchfoundation.com/art-in-public-spaces-and-community-interaction/
Xu, J., Ker, M., & Mustafa, M. (2024). Endowed with positive values and fatal weaknesses: Public art practices in post-industrial landscape — A systematic review. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i10.3092
Zebracki, M., Van Der Vaart, R., & Van Aalst, I. (2010). Deconstructing public artopia: Situating public-art claims within practice. Geoforum, 41(5), 786-795.
Zhou, Y., Sanz-Hernández, A., & Hernández-Muñoz, S. M. (2024). Artistic interventions in urban renewal: Exploring the social impact and contribution of public art to sustainable urban development goals. Societies, 14(10), 204.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Herança
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
8.png)
